A federal judge on Tuesday refused billionaire Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency to reach government data systems or block the participation in the activist.
US District Judge Tanya Chutkan found that there are valid questions about Musk’s right, but said that there is no evidence of such serious legal losses that are out of a temporary restraint order of women.
The decision came into the trial filed by 14 Democratic states, which challenges Dog’s rights to reach sensitive government data. The Attorney General argued that the musk was promoting the child of power that the Constitution said that only the hero could be the hero who is selected or confirmed by the Senate.
The Trump administration, for its share, has ensured that the retrenchment agency is coming from the heads, and despite its public cheer of the attempt, Musk is not running the day-to-day operation of Dogi directly.
Dog has tapped into computer systems in several agencies with the blessings of President Donald Trump, what is called excavation in the budget and what is called waste, frow and misconduct, even accusing the increasing number of cases Used to be.
Chutkan recognized the concerns of the group of states, including New Mexico and Arizona.
He wrote, “Dogi’s impervious actions resulted in a lot of uncertainty and confusion.” Their questions about the clear “uncontrolled authority” of Musk’s clear “uncontrolled authority” and lack of inspection of the Congress are valid and they may later be able to argue them successfully.
Nevertheless, at this point, it is not clear how the work of Dogi will affect the states, and the judge can only order to block the specific, immediate loss, he found.
Chutkan, named by Democratic President Barack Obama, had earlier abolished the case of criminal criminal election intervention against Trump in Washington.