Lebanese’s political leadership is stable in its perspective that Israel has to fulfill all parts of the latest ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hizbullah.
The deal, which ended in late January, among other aspects, is that the Lebanese army would control the southern Lebanon with at least 5,000 soldiers in place of Israeli soldiers, which will be withered.
However, Israel said that Wake placed it at five places near the border, accusing the Lebanese military of not quickly deployed the essential soldiers sufficiently.
The Israeli looks at Lebanon to guarantee security in the border region, where he is afraid that Lebanese Hizbullah Milsia may carry out his attacks on the residents of Israel.
“Lebanese President Joseph Aun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salaam and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri said earlier this week,” Lebanon’s army is ready to fulfill all its duties with the border. “
In turn, he called the ongoing Israeli appearance for “Lebanese’s possession” and stated that he would “turn to address the Israeli violation and forced Israel to wither.”
Mauhile, the United Nations has called both sides to follow 1701 and resolve.
“Today, as a hypothesis from the end of an understanding of the hosting of 26 November for the return of the parallel Lebanese Armed Forces for the refund of the period in the southern Lebanon for the return of Israel defense forces to the south of the Blue Line, as” joint As a nation, the United Nations includes Special Coordinator for Lebanon, Genin Hennis-Plazachtert, and United Nations Peeppertors Unifided Tuesday Said to Joint details,
The statement continued, “Another delay in this process is not that we do not expect Wolden, not at least because it continues to violate the United Nations Security Council proposal 1701.”
Resolution 1701 was then passed in 2006 in the context of the end of the war between Israel and Hizbullah. This, among other things, that only the Uniflished soldiers and the Lebanese Army are to be deployed in the Lebanese border area with Israel.
‘Violation of United Nations resolution 1701’
Merin Abbas, head of the Lebanon Office of Frederick-Ebert-Foundation, told Merin Abbas, head of the Lebanon Office of Frederick-Ebert-Foundation in Birut, “Due to the height of the places and the affiliated monitoring possibilities, Israel has a strategic benefit if it Is being posted there. “
Therefore, it is understandable that the army has to protect the Israeli villages near the border, he said.
“But this decision clearly violates and resolves 1701, which provides for the full return of the Israeli army from Lebanon,” said Abbas.
According to a statement by Israeli defense forces spokesperson Nadav Shoshni, thesis places were chosen with their safety importance as well as their geographical proximity to the Israeli communities.
He said that they offer convenience points that allow the Israeli forces to monitor and prevent new attachments near the Hizbollah attacks or the Israeli border.
“This is a temporary remedy as long as the Lebanese Armed Forces are not able to fully implement understanding,” said Shiphosh.
However, Israeli military supervisor Yakov Lapin exposed one Recently opt-ed In news outlet Jewish News Syndicate “The desire to follow the Hizbullah’s agreement and the boundary is absolutely non-existent to avoid rebuilding the reconstruction of their military infrastructure.”
“It is mainly dependent on the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to continue using force to prevent Hizbullah’s re -promotion,” he wrote.
Lebanese political scientist Dawood Ramal believes that Israeli has other objectives.
By capturing five places, Israel’s goal is to complete the un–leading blue line, the performance line between Israel and Lebanon, he told DW.
Ramal said, “Thesis is moving away in the more Lebanese sector on the pretext of remaining strategically designed in strategically designed places,” said Ramal, “Israel is not chasing a strategic military target,” This is the sephi system, especially its satellites, especially its satellites, it can be fully monitored by Lebanese. “
Hizbullah: ‘We will know how to deal with it’
Meanwhile, Hizbullah General Secretary Nime Kasssem on Sunday warned Israel that his forces should be correct by Lebanon.
“The Lebanese state should prevent Israel from remaining in the country,” Kasem said in a broadcast speech.
This is what the ceasefire determines, and if failed to follow Israel “we know how to deal with it,” Hey said.
The ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hizbullah was designed to launch a war between Hizbullah and Israel on October 7, 2023 after Hamas’s attack in Israel, with more than 1: 100 dead. More than 250 people were abducted by Hamas in Israel, classified as a terrorist organization by Germany, European Union, America and some Arab states.
Hizbullah’s military wing is classified as a terrorist organization by the US, Germany and many Sunni states.
“Hizbullah has always legalized his existence with the presence of Israel in Lebanon,” Abbas told DW. “In this regard, the current situation can suit them well.”
Lebanese supervisor Dawood Ramal said that the continuous presence of Israel in Lebanon could form armed Lebanese groups, as it was in the 1980s and 1990s.
Thesis groups were associated with secular or Islamic Lebanese parties and operated against Israel in the Lebanese region.
Ramal told DW, “Of course, a repetition is not in the interest of international security and peace,” Ramal told DW, saying that he does not expect a military response from Hizbullah at this time.
Danger of political instability
This scene is echoed by Merin Abbas.
He so that the continuous presence of Israel’s armed forces in Lebanon is another problem, namely the internal political instability of Lebanon.
Abbas told DW, “This weakens the reputation of President Joseph Aon in Lebanon and with the new Lebanese government,” Abbas told DW.
“Lebanese’s politicians are now not only under pressure from Hizbollah, but also under the Lebanese society, given that the problem is no lover between Hizbullah and Israel, but between the Lebanese kingdom and Israel,” Heer said. “If it intensifies, it will hardly be in the interests of the international community.”
This article was the original published in German.
