The nations on Thursday spoke of a final gasp, which took place on Thursday to make a map of money to protect nature, in the United Nations interaction, a deadlock was broken and seen as a test for international cooperation in front of geopolitical stresses.
The rich and developing countries signed a delicate agreement on increasing and distributing the billions of dollars required to protect the species, which reduced its previous meeting in Cali, Colombia last year.
Delegates stood at an emotionally charging final meeting and clapped, which saw the major decisions adopted in the last minute of the dialogue at the UNS Food and Agriculture Organization Headquarters in Rome.
Susana Muhammad, president of COP16, Columbia, praised the fact that countries worked together for a success, “enabled progress in this very fragmented and disputed world,” he said.
“It’s something beautiful because it is around the protection of life that we have come together, and may not be even more higher,” he said.
This decision comes more than two years after a historical deal to prevent the destruction of nature in this decade and protects ecosystems and wildlife that rely for human food, climate regulation and economic prosperity.
A million species are threatened with extinction, while unstable cultivation and consumption destroy forests, destroy the soil and spread plastic pollution in the planet’s most remote areas.
On Thursday, the agreement has been seen as important to give imports for the 2022 deal, which was observed that the country agrees to protect 30% of the world’s land and seas.
The talks for international cooperation were seen as a bellweeder.
Countries as a meeting face many challenges, ranging from business disputes and debate concerns to foreign aid.
Washington, who has not signed a United Nations Conference on biological diversity, did not send any representative to the meeting.
“Our efforts suggest that multilateralism can offer hope of geopolitical uncertainty,” said Canada’s Environment and Climate Change Minister Steven Gilballt said.
Speaking from Senegal’s Ocenau Kasen, Africa group, ie, threw support behind global cooperation.
“We believe that this is the way that can save the world, and we should continue this path,” Heer said.
Countries “should be accountable to our children, for generations to come,” Hey said.
Failure to finalize an agreement in Cali was the first in a link to disappointing results at the Environment Summit last year.
A climate finance deal development in COP29 in Azerbaijan in November was slammed by the country, while in December, separate interactions about desert and plastic pollution.
Countries have already agreed to a target to give $ 200 billion per year to nature by 2030, including $ 30 billion per year from rich countries to poor people.
According to OECD, what is the total $ 15 billion for 2022. Callie and later the main debate in Rome was on the call of developing countries for the creation of a specific biodiversity fund, which has seen pushbacks from the European Union and other wealthy nations, which have argued against many funds.
The agreement reached in Rome leaves the 2028 COP to decide whether the United Nations is to install a specific new fund under the biodiversity process, or is the name of a potentially improvised existing fund to play that role.
An achievement in Cali was the creation of a new discovery, which was a new discovery to share benefits from plants and animals digitally sequential genetic data with those communities.
Funds launched on Tuesday are designed to contribute to a part of their income by developing things such as drug and cosmetics using this data for large firms.
Representatives in Cali thus approved the construction of a permanent body to represent the interests of indigenous people.
