Most Ukrainian President Volodimier was closely after the visit to Zelanson’s Washington, where Ukraine and America were to sign an agreement on minerals. From the American side, it was about to pave the way for conversation on peace in Ukraine. But a line between Zelancesi and US President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance changed everything on their heads.
Truth, weapon and security guarantee
The Ukrainian political party through European solidarity Volodimier believes that Zelancesi with a clear message defended the truth about the war of aggression of Russia’s war against Ukraine: who started the war, who blamed and who is aggressive. However, the White House has no mood to hear the thesis truth.
Vjatrovych wrote on Facebook, “Trump and Vance have songs about the war and wanted to publicly accept this lie to Zelansky.” “It’s good that it did not happen, because truth is one of the most important components of war. Certainly, we need American weapons to be able to fight, but we need truth to understand what we are fighting for.” On the other hand, his party’s ally, Parliamentian Olexy Honachereko criticized Zelanceci’s behavior on Telegram, “Horror” and “End for Tram with Trump”.
Support for Zelansky was expressed by his closest colleagues, including the President’s office Andry Yerm, Prime Minister Dennis Shamihal, Internal Minister Ihor Climbingko and the head of the governing party servants of the people of the people. All of them emphasized the need for real safety guarantee for Ukraine.
Andry Yarmak wrote on Telegram, “Safety means life, without a future, without loss, without any fear. American people for their support of Ukraine. So on Telegram, Dennis Shamil wrote that the Ukrainian president is right when he says that peace is impossible without security guarantee. The Prime Minister said,” It is a danger to the European General. “
‘Change in geopolitics’
What happened in Washington, after that, not only the US and Russia, but also Ukraine, according to the Sera Harsimchuk to the Research Center, Ukraine must sit on the table of interaction to end the war in the future – Ukrainian prism. “Europe wants to sit on the table, as Europe has largely biased from one side,” he told DW. With some exceptions, the European heads and the heads of the government unanimously expressed their support for Zelancesi. Neither the Kremlin nor the White House can ignore it, the expert believes.
At the same time, Herrasimchuk extended the meeting to lead the world to move to tectonic changes in the United States’ perception “, you did not deny that some European countries would look at a waiting-and-world. Some South East Asian countries can conclude that Washington is a risky partner for them, “It is better to find the common ground with China until it is a matter of conflict, in which we will not support them.”
Other, like Ukraine, we will try to fight, the expert said. “I hope the European Union and Ukraine want to achieve positive results together in this battle,” they insisted that Zelansky’s quarrel with Trump and Vance triggered a strong European response. He said that Europe should soon present a clear message of support for Ukraine and concrete measures. At the same time, Harsimchuk is afraid that the US may now refuse to provide military assistance to Ukraine – he thought he would say that NATO colleagues could stop it.
Discussion on social media
On social media, Ukrainians are arguing about how Zelanski was rebuilt in the White House and whether he reached there correctly. Online newspaper “Detector Media,” Editor-in-Chief Natalia Ligachova defended Zelanceci on Facebook: “You can’t talk like the President of the country who has already sacrificed thousands and thousands of people, but for our freedom, but this is the same. Freedom, peace and prosperity of the western world.
Ilya Nesodowski, director of the Socio-Economic Transformation Institute, believes that Ukraine was humiliated in the meeting. “It was right for Zelanski to defend our dignity, but it was a mistake to join an argument for him,” he wrote on Facebook. “The agreement would not have guaranteed us any security, Trump did not want to supply us with more weapons before this agreement.” He believes that Trump can now partially lift the sanctions against Russia: but then the question will arise, what in return?
The “WeR European” movement of Ukrainian believes that Trump and his administration representatives did everything to satisfy their voters in the meeting in front of the cameras. “Is Zelancesi, who has received a permanent ovation as a representation of heroic Ukraine in the parliament around the civilized world, and Trump openly told him, ‘You are nothing,’ Putin will only be for me ‘he wrote on Facebook.
‘A drama performed by two actors’
Journalist Seri Rudankco believes that Trump has felt that he would not have his voters to fulfill the promises of his campaign in relation to the end of the war in Ukraine, which is why he wants to transfer the responsibility for it on Zelancesi. “This is a drama performed by two actors, Trump and Vance. They do not require a mineral agreement. They just need a sacrifice of a sacrifice for their inability and cowardice in the face of Vladimir Putin.
Comparison of the meeting between a film scene between Zelansky and Trump has gone viral on social media. Ukrainians are making fun of how they would respond to the provocation of US administration, collecting funds for their country’s nuclear real with some irony. Monobank co-founder Oleh Horochowski announced that his funding campaign for the production of nuclear weapons had raised two million Hrivanese (about € 46,000) in the first 30 minutes. That morning, he wrote on Telegram: “10 million in 10 million!”
In 1994, Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan surrendered all nuclear weapons in their territory after the Soviet Union collapse in the Soviet Union, by signing the Budapest Memorandum and the Non-Graduate Treaty. In turn, the US and Russia, in particular, guarantee their regional integrity.
This article was original in Ukrainian.
