While Bitcoin seduces visionaries and skeptics alike, the idea of turning it into a national reserve collides with a wall of politics, skepticism and tradition. Why is it still just a dream?
Bitcoin is already seen by many people on the planet as digital gold that promises to revolutionize global finances, even shines with a glow that dazzles and blinds others. But, in the heart of the United States, The dream of becoming Strategic reserve It fades as a mirage in the desert of politics and distrust.
The ambition for a Bitcoin reserve for the United States won a traction since Donald Trump turned it into promise when he was a candidate. And then, he advanced with an executive order signed on March 6, 2025, as Cryptonoticia reported at that time.
This order granted a period of 60 days for Treasury Secretary, Scott Besent, to evaluate the creation of a Bitcoin strategic reserve and a digital asset deposit in the United States, identifying custody accounts and possible legislative needs.
In addition, the mandate intends to centralize seized digital assets, excluding Bitcoin, in a unified deposit, with federal agencies reviewing their authority to transfer them to the treasure. However, fulfilled the deadline yesterday, The findings of these revisions still are publishedleaving the initiative wrapped in uncertainty.
That naked fact the reality that Bitcoin’s strategic reserve in the United States remains a mirage on the financial horizon. This truth was transferred to Rose Rumble in the Fine Forum, an event that faced Anthony Scaramucci, former communications director of Donald Trump and the investor and television personality Kevin O’Leary in a debate that reflects what may be leaving in limbo to the intentions of creating a national treasure of BTC. Everything seems to indicate that innovation on the financial system clashes against political inertia and economic caution.
Bitcoin vs. The traditional system: which one wins?
The discussion was lit following a public question about the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Law. That this question arose spontaneously from the audience is, in itself, a clear indicator of the palpable global interest that exists around the potential creation of such a reserve by the United States.
In response, Scaramucci vehemently defended the proposal promoted by Senator Cynthia Lummis. Argued that A Bitcoin reserve could be beneficial for the US economyprovided that it is implemented with a bipartisan support.
In his opinion, the next six months will be crucial to consolidate this support and prevent the initiative from being dismantled by political swings. Scaramucci recalled that the United States already manages 27 strategic reserves, ranging from oil to rare metals, and leaned in favor of Bitcoin becoming as one more asset, promoting the country’s economic diversification.
However, O’Leary offered a more skeptical perspective. For him, the idea of A Bitcoin strategic reserve is unrealistic due to the lack of political consensus. “We will never get a bipartisan purchase,” he said categorically, noting that polarization in Congress makes an agreement of this magnitude unlikely.
Instead, O’Leary advocated the digitalization of the dollar through Stablecoins such as USDC, of which he is a shareholder. According to him, these currencies, backed by dollars and with minimal transaction costs, represent a more practical solution to modernize the global financial system, without the speculative risks associated with Bitcoin.
The debate reflected a broader dilemma, such as the tension that has existed for years about stability that, according to regulators and politicians, demands the traditional financial system. Bitcoin, despite its growing acceptance, remains a volatile asset, and it is believed that its adoption as a national reserve would imply significant risks.
For his part, Scaramucci recognized the need for a cautious approach, citing the concern that a unilateral executive action could be reversed by a future administration. This while O’Leary stressed that The priority should be to maintain the domain of the dollar as a global reference currencysomething that a stablecoin could achieve without altering the status quo, according to its perspective.
More barriers stop a Bitcoin reserve
In addition, the current political context adds another layer of complexity. The legislation for the creation of a Bitcoin reserve, although backed by influential figures in the ecosystem of digital assets, faces a divided congress and a public opinion that does not yet fully understand the implications that a power like the United States possesses a national treasure in Bitcoin.
The lack of financial education about Bitcoin, combined with fears about its use in illegal activities, makes it difficult to institutionalize. Even the support of figures such as Michael Saylor, who has passionately defended Bitcoin as a reserve of value, has not been enough to overcome these barriers.
In this way, the Rose Rumble exposed the divergent positions on Bitcoin, and also the Difficulty aligning interest in a country where economic and political priorities often collide.
While Scaramucci sees in Bitcoin an opportunity to innovate, O’Leary bets on more conservative solutions that preserve the hegemony of the dollar. Both agree, however, that any significant change will require a consensus that, for now, seems distant.
In short, Bitcoin’s strategic reserve in the United States remains a dream due to the lack of unified political support, the risks inherent in its volatility and preference for alternatives considered less disruptive, such as Stablcoins. While the debate continues, events such as Rose Rumble show that the conversation about the future of money is more alive than ever, but The way to a Bitcoin reserve is still full of questions.
