The United States has entered Israel-Iran, President Donald Trump confirmed the US forces that three Iranium enrichment sites have been attacked.
Trump is followed by attacks, the US Army Commander-in-Chief, asked if he had to enter the growing conflict between the calls from Israel for his support and he said that he took a decision within two weeks.
The war began on 13 June with Israel, with a series of air strikes against the goals associated with Iran’s nuclear program.
Since then, efforts for a diplomatic solution for the rapidly growing struggle for the broker by other countries have failed.
What has America done for Iran’s nuclear facilities?
On Saturday (US Time), Trump announced that US forces had attacked Iran’s Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities.
The Pentagon on Sunday confirmed the seven B -2 Spirit Bombers from the US Air Force base to start the attacks before returning home.
Payoad had 30,000 pounds (13.600 kg) “bunker-busting” warheads. In association with the B -2 Spirit Bombers, it is believed that Iran’s subtrenian is the only combination capable of deeply predominance of nuclear features and is the only combination that is probably an important reason that the US entered the struggle.
Was attacks on Iran’s atomic sites successful?
Trump claimed that the “attack was a great military success” at a press conference after a three-sight attack.
“Bees have been fully added to Iran’s major nuclear enrichment facilities,” he said.
While the possibility of attacks has caused significant damage, not independently verified to this extent. Germany believes that Iran’s nuclear program has been damaged by the “large parts” attacks.
However, some analysts believe that rich uranium may have removed bees before the attack based on satellite images showing activity on the Fordo site.
“Rich uranium stock can so be transferred to sites not monitored by IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency]”French nuclear expert Helloz Fayet told the AFP news agency.
Is there a risk of nuclear radiation leaks due to attacks?
Iran’s reports indicate that there has been no increase in the “off-site radiation level” after the attacks.
IAEA, which will hold on Monday at an emergency meeting, has warned of damage to uranium enrichment sites, such as those attacked by the US have borne the risk of radiation leakage, which can affect the public.
Must attack more and more Shrub nuclear reactor -Ran’s only discovery feature-which last week, IAEA’s chair Rafael Grosi warned that radioactivity could be released on a large scale.
Why did America join?
During the election campaign, Trump promised a more peaceful world. If he returned to the White House, it was well revealed about the public spirit around the so -called “wars” of the US.
In his inauguration, he said that his administration will measure not only with winning battles, but also with wars we finish, and perhaps the most imports, wars we never meet. ,
His decision to enter America in the conflict between two long -standing enemies in the Middle East is a notable change from those January comments.
The United States and other nations are concerned about Iran’s desire to develop nuclear weapons despite a long -time statement that its nuclear program especially fulfills civil purposes. Between the conversation for the war and the introduction of Israel, Trump in a statement on Thursday, gave a two -week timetable to decide whether the US would enter the struggle directly. Barely within two days, three nuclear facilities were attacked by American bombers.
At Pentagon on Sunday, US Defense Secretary Peat Hegseth asked reporters to reporters the result of the attack from Trump “a plan and the result of the status and a plan for preparation.
Hegseth said, “It was a major part of accuracy.” “This included the highest of misunderstanding and operational safety.”
What is the background of the US attack?
Israel, which sees Iran’s uranium enrichment as an existential security threat, launched airstrikes against Iranian military and nuclear goals on 13 June, killing hundreds of people. The retaliatory attacks by Iran killed dozens in Israel.
After Israel started his attack, US State Secretary Marco Rubio said that the US said “was not in attacks against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region.”
The war began amidst a complex diplomatic status regarding Iran’s nuclear program.
A previous deal of the then US President Barack Obama was overseen, including the signature of the United Nations Security Council and five permanent members of Germany, promoting the limited Iran’s energy-generation grade forced it to surrender 98% of its rich uranium and easily opened the door to IAEA inspectors in exchange for restrictions.
After his first election victory, Trump withdrew the US from the agreement and called for Iran to return to the conversation on its terms.
In the years after that withdrawal, Iran has banned IAEA monitoring and inspection activities, and has allegedly extended its enhancement above 60%that is requested for civil energy generation and adorned weapon-grade levels.
Israel’s June attack on Iran follows American Iran’s five -round conversation on a new deal. Iran withdrew from a sixth round conversation after Israel’s attack on leg and launched its retaliation.
Now that the US has entered the struggle, Trump is demanding a sharp resolution.
Trump said, “There will be either peace for Iran.” “In the last eight days, we have more than what we have seen.
How is the rest of the world responding?
By praise from Israel and by chance from Iran, there has been a mixed reaction to American insertion in war.
Regional governments including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Qatar, Pakistan, India and Iraq have expressed respect to all. Many have clearly invited for de-size and a return to negotiations they can also be drawn into a contradiction.
Traditional American colleagues have urged a diplomatic solution, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the European Union.
Through a spokesman person, the German Chanman Chanich Murze called for Iran to “enter the immediate conversation with the US and Israel and find a diplomatic solution for the conflict.”
Those sentiments were echoed in public statements by Britain’s Prime Minister Kir Strandmer, European Commission Chairman Ursula von Der Leyen and France and Italian Foreign Minister.
American rivals China, Russia, both Iran colleagues chose American attacks.
There is a partition on Trump’s decision to include America close to the house.
Many Trump’s Democratic Party Opon has decided that they are not taking the approval of the Congress as unconstitutional.
While many Republicans, led by Senate Magority Leader John Thun and House Speaker Mike Johnson, have publicly supported the verdict, others, others, discovered as representatives, Warren Davidson and Thomas Massey, have eccres on the Congress cracks.
One of the most vocal advocates for Trump’s “US First” agenda, Republican Congresswoman Marjori Taylor Green said the Israel-Iran struggle was “not our fight”.
Will it expand into a big struggle?
The US now despite the inclusion of itself in Israel-Iran, Hegseth told reporters on Sunday that the Trump administration “does not seek war” with Iran.
Nor, he said, what about overthrowing the Iranian rule.
Immediately after the attacks, concerns will turn into possibilities of any further attacks from any side, and the possibility of radiation leaks from the destruction of atomic sites.
Inside Israel, after siren of an airstrikes after the news of the US attacks, inspired the locals to take shelter. Some have welcomed Trump’s interventionDespite the increase, possibly transferring the area to unknown.
The US has warned Iran against retaliatory attacks and again called it to return to conversation.
Iran has responded to the attacks by warning of “sustainable result” for the US and announced its nuclear program.
In the meantime, Iran’s diplomats have intended to meet with colleagues Russia, and its Parliament has approved the closure of Hormuz’s straight, an important global shipping channel, Hormuz’s Strait under confirmation by its National Security Council.
Edited by: Helen Whitel
