Order 6102 of 1933, which confiscated the gold, serves as the manual for a possible digital robbery.
The state plan progresses in phases: first watches, then it could prohibit BTC self -ocustody.
In 1933, Executive Order 6102 allowed the US Government to confiscate the gold of its citizens. Today, in a context of growing geopolitical tensions and regulations, governments could be preparing a “digital robbery” against Bitcoin. Global conflicts, such as those of the Middle East, could be the perfect smoke curtain to justify a new financial robbery.
To understand the future, we must first look at the past. This is because for more than 90 years, The war theater is governed by the same manual that allows and seeks to confiscate wealth.
Amid the great depression, in 1933, the president of the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt, forced US citizens to deliver their gold in exchange for devalued dollars, under the justification of stabilizing the economy during the great depression.
Other countries followed the example, since Australia restricted the possession of gold in 1934 with the Gold Control Actwhile the United Kingdom imposed controls in 1966 during a sterling pound crisis.
More recently, in 2013, Cyprus confiscated up to 47.5% of bank deposits exceeding 100,000 euros in a “corralito” to rescue his financial system.
These precedents show a clear pattern: In times of crisis, governments confiscate wealth. Today, Bitcoin, with its decentralized nature and its scheduled scarcity, has become the “digital gold” that states covers.
Bitcoin is the new gold, and the states covers it
The global financial system faces an unsustainable public debt, which exceeds 315 billion dollars according to the International Monetary Fund. However, printing more money only feeds inflation, devaluing coins and eroding purchasing power.
Before them, Bitcoin stands out for its limit of 21 million currencies and their resistance to censorship, offers an alternative that citizens are adopting to protect their wealth. This makes it a direct challenge to state monetary control.
Recent regulations, such as those approved in Washington, the capital of the United States, as well as in the states of Arizona, Texas, California and Spain, show that governments are already taking measures to legalize the confiscation.
The states They know that they cannot create bitcoin or print itand they also look at him as a threat to his power. Therefore, the state strategy follows a predictable script: if you cannot compete, destroy it; If you can’t destroy it, kill. And to justify theft, they need a crisis. They need a pretext, and that of war is the one that has worked best.
So that Bitcoin is no longer a threat to the state monopoly, they need to snatch it from their citizens. In such a way that the plan would be to neutralize the currency created by Satoshi Nakamoto, which is so much giving the already entire communities.
The script is already written and develops in 3 phases
With a look at the past it is easy to understand that if the story provides us with the manual of instructions for confiscation, current technology dictates the chapters of its execution.
The state plan for the confiscation of Bitcoin can be following a clear road map, advancing in three stages that combine regulation, technological coercion and, finally, the brute force.
Phase 1: The stealthy assault that is already happening. Through the industry regulation and with the KYC the International Financial Action Group (FATF), which force exchanges to collect user data. With this procedure, governments map who possesses bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. And this can be added confiscatory taxes that make their use unfeasible.
Phase 2: Digital corporation. The next step would be to prohibit self -ocustody, forcing citizens to maintain their assets in centralized exchanges and regulated banks. At that time, the funds in Bitcoin would cease to be of the users. They will be an accounting note to the Merced of the State.
Phase 3: Digital Order 6102. In the midst of the crisis generated or accelerated by war, a “national emergency” is declared and Bitcoin’s private possession is prohibited, demanding its delivery in exchange for devalued money from the State.
The current war, with its noise and fury, is the perfect smoke curtain. It provides moral and political justification to implement measures that in peace would be considered tyrannical.
War can also erode the defenses of economic freedom of the population. This with greater control over the only form of money that the State cannot master. The battle for the bitcoin that are held by the population can be seen as a theory, but also as the echo of a historical pattern that resonates with a terrifying clarity.
The war, inevitable or only smoke curtain?
Current conflicts, such as tensions between the US, Israel and Iran, provide an ideal pretext for states to take drastic financial measures.
The narrative of “national security” or The “fight against terrorism” has historically been used to justify surveillance and controlsuch as patriotic law or Patriot Act of 2001, which, among other things, expanded the monitoring of financial transactions.
Today, governments point to Bitcoin as a tool to finance illegal activities, despite the fact that studies such as Chainysis (2024) show that only 0.34% of cryptocurrency transactions are linked to illegal activities. This narrative could justify a mass confiscation, under the argument of “stabilizing the economy” or “finance the defense.”
In this context, the narrative of a “national emergency” by a nuclear threat can become the perfect pretext to justify draconian laws, as a modern version of Order 6102, which allows states to confiscate decentralized assets such as Bitcoin under the argument of “financing defense” or “stabilizing the economy.”
Protect your bitcoin, protect your freedom
Are you prepared to protect your wealth in a world where governments seek to control everything?
First, bet on self -ocustody. That is, keep your funds in BTC on platforms that ensure that your private keys remain in your hands, far from regulated custodians.
Second, prioritize privacy with tools such as Coinjoin, which hinder the tracking of your transactions.
And finally, Educate: Understand that the State is not your ally, but your adversary In a zero sum game where your financial freedom is at stake.
Discharge of responsibility: The views and opinions expressed in this article belong to its author and do not necessarily reflect those of cryptootics. The author’s opinion is informatively and under no circumstances constitutes an investment recommendation or financial advice.
