July 15, 2025
Constitutional court verdict on Yemeni drone case may be against implications: ECCHR
The verdict was not surprised by the German Constitutional Court by the German Constitutional Court in the US drone attacks on Yemen, Andreas Sholer said, the European Center for Constitutional and International Crime Center for Human Rights In the International Crime Center Accountable Program.
ECCHR is the NGO who supported two Yemeni plaintiffs in his complaint, arguing that Germany violated international law by failing to monitor the strict monitor or pre -US drone attacks from the Ramstein Air Base.
The court ruled that Berlin did not violate international law.
The student on Tuesday ruled for the DW as a “compromise”, although he insisted that his customers’ situation would not change.
“On the other hand, it has some good parts, which are more important for the German government that are more important with a violation of potential international law,” he said.
The student said that nothing could change in relation to the drone strike on the ruling Yemen, it was against the implications.
“It is on violation of international law. It is on the complexity of Germany among those among those. So it may be relevant to other conflicts where international law is being violated and where still supporting one of its colleagues,” said. “He said. “So this matter can result in results.”
Pupil insisted that Germany took responsibility in such cases as Ramstein is the American drone mission due to the significant importance of the air base.
“Data and signals go via Ramstein via satellites and then for the optic cable in real -time for drone in the sky above the Middle East,” Heer said.
The student said, however, the decision in the case brought by the Yemeni cannot be further appealed, describing Tuesday’s decision as “final”.
