After closing the Alborg Airport in Northern Denmark this week, after infiltration of drones into its airspace, the latest is the latest in a string of recent airport shutdowns due to equipment.
Therefore unmanned drones were allegedly seen at ESBjerg, Sonderborg and Skrydstrup Airports – later, with Aalborg, used for Royal Danish Air Force purposes. Earlier this week, there was a temporary suspension of flights at the airport in Copenhagen, the country’s capital.
Danish Defense Minister Trols Lund Paleson told a press conference This “everything indicates as a professional actor’s work” saying that “it definitely does not look like a coincidence. It looks systematic. It is what I will define as a hybrid attack.”
As Niti investigated the relationship, Justice Minister Peter Homelgard has said that he was not ruling in any way in the context of “who is behind it.”
Although there is no confirmation that Russia was involved in a drone incident in Denmark, Avatar recently called NATO for action by Avatar by Unseeded Aircraft in Europe. In response to Russian drones entering Polish airspace in early September, NATO general secretary Mark Rute announced that the Alliance is starting a new operation to protect his eastern flank, “Eastern Sentry”.
Danish officers are the latest just to find drone It is difficult to identify and contain the installation of an airport, and working with them is a very different set of challenges for those who face normally or the European Union.
Why can’t airports stop drone opportunities?
Drrones, or some type of unwanted fighter aerial vehicles, are widespread -numerous since the 1970s, and are now a feature of modern war, especially in Ukraine in Russia. But according to Richard Gill, founder and CEO of security business drone defense, technology is moving rapidly in the commercial market.
“The drone is easy to catch and easy to use,” he told DW. “And the price point is coming down correctly. People can now do goods in their garden that Ith has taken advanced military capability to be able to be able to do only 10 or 15 years ago.”
This is a real problem for airports, which should have tight control over their airspace. “This is once again shown, in the Denmark case, that flying with drones over airports will cause a suspended air traffic,” the European Center of Excellence of Hybrid Dangers (Hybrid COE) told DW. “There is no risk for aviation safety.”
This example, which has led the shutdown of the airport worldwide – can cause serious disruption with bad effects – from New York and London to Dubai and Frankfurt. But the ease of access means that hobbies can easily close an airport if they deviate in their navigation.
Why can’t the airport shoot drone just?
In war, the drone is shot all the time. But although security agencies may be suspicious, it is often impossible to determine whether a drone is military or it is entertaining before exiting the sight. Even on the occasion that it is possible, there are significant security concerns.
Savolanon of Hybrid Coa said, “It is not easy to hit the drone with kinetic projectile, so you must get a lot of fire to reach a satisfactory possibility of the hit,” “Even if you hit, most of the projects are searching that they fall down after being burnt.
Given that the danger is difficult to assess at some distance, and that airports are often close to the AEAS, the hazards of collateral damage, as well as the cost of shooting a drone, makes it all but impossible. Gill says that, given the speed of drone development, there is a gap in the law that leaves the airports weak.
“Not every airport has an detection system that is capable of understanding what is happening. Therefore, we usually trust people, security staff, or members of employees on the ground. Professional Currently airports have no legal basis on which the drone has to be shot.
What are the more ways to protect against drrones?
Unlike military or dual -form airports, strict commercial airports, especially those who are not well -revived international hub, do not have many tools in their disposal. Identification of drowning through radio frequency, video broadcasting, radar or safety cameras is one of the preventive measures, although even once recognized remains a challenge.
As a result, suspended activity – usually a extreme remedy – is often the first port of call when drone is once seen in a unauthorized area.
There is an increasing number of products aimed at preventing drones for both commercial and military markets. But upgrading the airport defense systems is an expensive business, and possibly will require continuous upgrades.
Ryanier’s CEO Michael O’Leeri suggested that governments footed the bill to a problem, which they have described as “obstacles”.
“This is a safety issue for national governments. It is not something you will ask to do with the airports,” hey said.
To some extent, the European Union appears to accept that analysis. European Commission Chairman Ursula von Der Leyen said on September 10 that Europe should attempt to curb further threat “a drone wall should be constructed” Overview of drones in sovereign airspace.
The dubbed Eastern Flance Watch is a cooperative project to Wall that includes Poland, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, which aims to strengthen the rescue on the Eastern borders of the European Union. This will use similar measures for those available for airports, but, crucley may be able to move down the dangerous drone, although the details on it are thin. So it allegedly wants to be much cheaper per use than current air defense systems, which were designed keeping in mind more traditional manned aircraft and missiles.,
“This is not an abstract ambition,” Leyen said about the plans. “It is a threat to reliable defense.”
Edited by: Maran Sas