Bitcoin in the era of division and censorship

Wars, invasions, crucial geopolitical decisions, and a hatred increasingly rooted in cyberspace. The result? Destroyed families, razed territories, and new generations marked by resentment, ready to take revenge in the coming decades.

The only thing I see is an increasingly divided world, more polarized and injured, dragging unsolved conflicts for centuries and projecting them towards an equally turbulent future.

So we live today: in a dystopia that seems to have become a routine. And that silent resignation is as uncomfortable as the facts themselves.

The dynamics of the world accelerate. And as it is always easier to destroy than build, the negative spreads like an unstoppable jet stream. We discuss less with arguments, and more with provocations. Algorithms reinforce our bubbles, showing only what we want to see, not what we need. We read less, we impose more.

We advance in technology, yes. We create spectacular tools that simplify life. But at the same time, we tolerate the other less. We became more anxious, more selective, more impatient, and that cultivation broth feeds power conflicts.

In the midst of this chaos, Bitcoin represents me an oasis in the desert. Because its foundations are a reminder that we can do things differently. A system that does not depend on human whim, but on firm principles. Something that helps us stay smes and focused, without losing between noise and temptations.

At least, I think so.

Neither one thing, nor the other

Partisan policy, religion and the opinion of certain leaders work, many times, similar to when an older brother gave you a disconnected joystick, so that you would think you were really influencing a game where, in reality, he was the one who had the command.

Frequently, he “buys” an audience by establishing a speech that will then serve to justify a subsequent action. “Yes, but this president steals less!” or “He ordered to kill less people than the previous one!” They are some frequent phrases among people.

Many do not resist taking sides into a conversation and fall into the trap. For this group, it is “black or white”, without any possibility of thinking outside the box, without allowing to question that both sides could be equally wrong.

A good part of humanity feels the need to belong to “something”, to some movement with name and surname, in order to make sense and direction to their life. We all do it to a greater or lesser extent, but the difference always lies in what we are looking for.

The other war: excess information and social networks

In addition to the missiles and bombs that fall every minute destroying innocent lives, there is another bombing that we rarely stop to reflect, perhaps because we have naturalized it: the influence on the Digital information consumption.

The prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu said recently, while he is completely razing Gaza, ensuring that “weapons are changing over time, and today those weapons are on social networks.” He also put Tiktok and X in the top positions of world influence.

But it’s not just that. Day by day, governments have Surveillance, pursue and censorship tools With an efficiency never seen.

Today, social media blockade is frequent to certain people who oppose a government. Or, total “blackouts” of applications to generate an intentional disconnection between the inhabitants of a region.

In other cases, visa requested are already denied to enter countries. A more extreme example is that of Nicaragua, where its co -president Daniel Ortega has expropriated goods to opponents and has stripped them of their nationality.

And this is just the principle of what awaits us.

One less, a thousand new

Many human beings They live with the false idea That, if they manage to exterminate their “opposite side” completely, the world will automatically be a better place.

But history has shown us, again and again, that in the attempt to eradicate what is hated or rejected, The situation can be converted into something worse.

In 2016, a BBC video that illustrates this bluntly. In it, Kadhim al Jabbouri, an Iraqi mechanic who once repaired motorcycles for the Saddam Hussein regime shares its history. He says that at least 14 family members were killed by that same regime, and that he himself participated in the demolition of the Hussein statue in Baghdad after the US invasion in 2003.

However, more than a decade later, with the country devastated by war and mired in chaos, Iraq became a focus of violence, corruption and generalized suffering. In Kadhim’s words: “Saddam is gone, but in its place there are 1,000 Saddams”. He even expressed his desire to rebuild the statue.

Names, faces and speeches change, but the logic of power is often recycled in even more dangerous ways. A “rebellion on the farm” come true.

A similar case is that of Ahmed al-Sharaa, the self-proclaimed president of Syria since the beginning of this year, after participating in the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad. Al-Sharaa was affiliated with Al-Qaeda, and at the time the United States offered a reward of 10 million dollars for its capture.

In January, he left the turban behind, the beard was cut and hung his AK-47. Recently, it appeared in the United Nations General Assembly In New York, dressed in bag and tie, greeting the authorities as another diplomat. He gave his speech and sat between heads of state.

All this reminds us of how complex and often absurd power can be the games of power.

Bitcoin, on the other hand, represents a totally different idea. It encourages us not to follow leaders, to distrust the concentration of power, Already avoid the temptation to identify blindly with a human figure that can always change their minds, betray principles or let yourself be corrupted.

Perhaps one of Satoshi Nakamoto’s greatest successes was to disappear. His absence not only eliminated the risk of personality worship, but left something stronger: An idea without owner.

A peaceful protest

If you are reading this, it is because you have Free access to digital information. Only that already makes you a privileged person. You have in your hands the ability to do Zoom out And see, with greater perspective, what is happening in the world. And, above all, to realize that, many times, those who believe they come to save us, are actually those who want to keep us trapped.

Politics (at least as we know it today), rarely works at one hundred percent clean. To become a politician, there are groups that have to “help you get.” These groups have real power, and although they do not always direct what should be done, they impose conditions.

Favors to return. Decisions that no longer depend on their own ideology. The promised is diluted. And, in many cases, you do not hesitate to use any available tool to protect interests: divert funds, extort, pursue or censor those who bother too much.

One of the things that I like most in Bitcoin is its political component, although paradoxically, not responding to any party. Because yes: spreading Satoshi’s idea is to do politics, but in a completely different way. Without leaders, without foundations, without employees, without candidates, without corruption, without weapons, without budgets, without marketing campaigns. An efficient, transparent, voluntary policy and, above all, neutral.

Bitcoin does not care about your sexual preference, your religion, your party, your country of origin, your language, if you have overweight, if you are a terrorist or if you like the ice cream of hailstorm mint (reason for discussions if any). That, which sounds simple, Today it represents an oasis in the middle of the desert.

Always remember when Bitcoin Whitepaper is presented. And not. It is not only the year that Kung Fu Panda premiered, but also the year of the Great global financial crisis: 2008. Bitcoin was born in a challenging context, as an answer, and demonstrates a resilience rarely seen in front of an Orwellian dyes system.

The light at the end of the road

All this may sound quite dark, but I do not usually leave my readers with a bitter taste. On the contrary: If something is left as individuals, it is the ability to change. To grow. And, above all, of making decisions that sometimes imply moving the helm abruptly.

Recently, Elon Musk asked what his brief experience as a public official of the United States this year left him. His answer was overwhelming: “The government is basically irreparable”.

Regardless of what each one thinks about the current richest man in the world, we all know that participating in the government of the “President Stablecoin Trump“ (As Alex Gladstein recently baptized him), or in any other, he implies endorsing certain things and shutting up others. A greater deficit, an uncontrolled debt, among others.

For his own good, the best he did was retire and continue his original path. A path on which it does have the power to influence progress: launch rockets, build the vehicles of the future and develop cutting -edge technology in multiple items.

And that is where a deeper reflection appears: when even someone with him Musk’s level of power and influence He admits that he cannot change the system from the inside, what is left for the rest of us?

In that sense, tools such as Bitcoin represent a great alternative. Not a magical solution, but a tool that allows us intellectually honest.

Invites us to question everything, to develop our critical spirit Faced with the injustices that surround us every day and offer our test of work to achieve the change we are looking for in the world.

Bitcoin is, in a way, a way to channel that desire for transformation. Represents a Oasis in the desertin the midst of so much noise and misinformation. A way of rebelling without harming anyone, voluntary, not ideologically commanded by anyone (at least, no one we have even seen in a photo).

I think that is one of the most worthy battles of which we can be part today. It already exists. The only thing we lack is to bring this opportunity to more people.