Did the online satire “open the gates” in the Super Bowl for the purpose of Taylor Swift?
This is a possibility, according to the researchers behind a new study, negative public opinions can play a satirical role in shaping.
A few months before the Super Bowl incident, the fans were willing to spend hundreds of dollars to watch the Swift performance on their record breaking eras tour. But when he appealed on the screen at the Super Bowle, he met with the boz.
There are many potential explanations for this, most clear that Swift lover, Travis Cels, are playing in the game for the heads of Cansus City, making him an easy goal for the Irish of rival fans.
The game was a Republican state in Louisiana, where support for Democratic candidates could promote negative reactions.
And, of course, celebrities are often the subject of “leg popy syndrome”.
But another, less well -understood event can occur in sports.
Since declaring his support for Biden in 2020 and Kamala Harris in 2024, Swift has been aiming for the principles of right -wing satire and conspiracy. Puppet for a secret operative for biden administration.
While those reasons are likely to explain the public georing of Swift, published in the study Experimental Psychology Journal, Suggestions that the effect of satire can surprisingly be harmful to someone’s reputation, and more than direct criticism.
Satire makes fun of people, but can it go too far?
Santa Clara University, the US study co-writer Huria Jazieri told DW that unlike the critics of someone’s specific tasks or statements, the satire turned his goal, turning him into a caricature.
“Most people think that satire is just humble and fickle, but inhumanization is present on a spectrum and can include things that forget that others have complex feelings and feelings,” Jazri said.
To understand whether the satire causes more iconic damage than direct criticism despite his comic nature, Zajri and his colleague Derek Rooker handled six experiments from Northwestern University, US well.
Thesis targeted famous figures such as Tom Brady, Mark Zuckerberg and Gwneth Paltro, as well as a fictional person. The participants were then asked to rank the perception of the people they had just seen.
Their hypothesis that satire can cause more damage to reputation than direct criticisms by results, by reducing the goals to the caricature.
“Satire, instead of being dull, instead of criticism blades,” they found, “more, as a clarification for this effect, when compared to direct critic The reason people were more negatively evaluated by the target reputation. “
Satire can be useful, but stop when it stops strange
While the satire may cross into some harmful fields, it can also be a powerful tool for political criticism, highlighting corruption and social injustice.
For example, Thomas Nast’s cartoon played an important role in tweeting the corrupt New York Mayor Boss in the 1870s, rally a public support rally for improvement, an expert in American culture and history of Boston College, US and author Paul Lewis said. Cracking Up: In the time of American comedy conflict,
Similarly, like shows The daily show Or Last week tonight Use humor to highlight the wrongdoing of the government, motivate reflections and encourage public discourse.
If the congestion response was fuel by satire in the case of Swift, it can highlight how satire can deviate from these benefits and become a form of bullying.
Louis said, “Comedy in bullying can reduce the resistance of the audience who can otherwise object to the cruelty.”
When humorous criticism occurs an attacking attack, satire can become a form of bullying.
This change occurs when humor focuses on making fun of individuals without offering meaningful insights, aiming to reduce their dignity instead. Some studies suggest that bullying humor may have a mental health effect on mental health, when it is normalized by impressive figures or audiences. For such ridicule, long contacts can damage the target, causing depression, anxiety, and less self-stesm.
The sympathy may be a deadly for satire.
The online satire for the purpose of Swift probably said “Khole Koi Gates”, “Gates” in the Super Bowl, Rooker said.
He and Jazier’s research suggests that Swift may focus on future studies, given the strong division between “Swifts” and online detectors.
The same people who blew him could be easily reminded as to why they praised him in the first place.
Rooker and Jajeri found a potentially involved for the inhuman effects of satire in one of their experiments: imagining a positive interaction with the target of satire can soften negative perceptions by restoring their humanity.
In other words, a moment of sympathy – Hover Small – can help combat inhumanization that satire often fuel.
However, it is possible that the Swift compartments in the super bowl can become fodder for further satire, making a amplification loop. The study did not specifically detect this possibility, but Rooker accepted it as a commendable result. “People should think more important about how their work affects the other,” he said.
Edited by: Matthew Ward Egius
Source:
“To intensify soft or blades: checking the iconic effects of satire,” Huria Jaziani, PhD, Santa Clara University, and Derek D. Rooker, PhD, Northwestern University, Journal of Experimental Psychology: GeneralPublished online. February 10, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001729
“Long -term effects of bullying on mental health.” Arsensaault L. World psychotherapyFebruary 16 (1): 27-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20399.
