EPA stepped into environmental supervision – DW – 07/30/2025

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) director Lee Zeldin on Tuesday argued that his agency did not have the right to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

Zeldin stated that in 2009 there is a major scientific evaluation of the dangers of greenhouse gases that outlines the legal authority of the federal government and the responsibility for regulating emissions – known as the “danger detection” – which is based on defective argument.

Zeldin further stated that the Supreme Court’s 2024 “Chevron Difference” verdict means the Congress has the right to regulate vehicles and energy emissions, not with EPA.

“We have no such agency to decide that we are going to compete with global climate change.

The EPA director said that environmental regulation has created a massive drag over the US economy and promised that the government will reduce emission standards.

In the comments made at the Kenworth Truck Factory in Indiana, Indiana, he said, “If finalized, today’s announcement will be for the biggest deregulator action in the history of the United States,” he said in the comments made at the Caneworth truck factory in Indianaapolis, Indiana, Indiana.

The EPA boss says that the assessment of the danger of emission was ‘conceptual’

Standing with Energy Secretary Chris Wright – a former gas industry executed – New York Republican Zeldin accused the previous administration of producing ideological evaluation of health threats generated by Greenhouse Gas.

Will it take a treaty to phase fossil fuels?

Enable JavaScript to watch this video, and consider upgrading to a web browser HTML5 supports video

An EPA press statement on the subject claimed that the Obama and the Biden administration used the search to justify “more than $ 1 trillion in the rules”.

At the same time, the statement claimed that steps to scrape the danger would save $ 54 billion annually.

There was no evidence to return the claims.

what happens next?

Finding the crisis, a colleague was reviewed on the basis of scientific consent, which took place after the Supreme Court’s landmark. Massachusetts vs EPA Case in 2007.

At that time, the court, which controls the air quality, gave the EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and ordered the administration to determine whether thesis has endangered public health.

Zeldin said that the dancing of Wood is away with an electric vehicle mandate and runs “a dagger in the heart of climate change religion”.

The step is sure to face legal challenges and the administration will expect the Supreme Court to reverse the 2007 decision and rule in its favor when the matter compulsorily makes its way.

Dan Baker of the US -based Environment NGO Center for Biological Diversity told the AFP news agency that the government is unique to argue itself against strict regulation, not to the industry.

Baker said that he hopes that the court wants “it is science that it is science and not politics.”

“There was a good reason for him [2007] The example and no good reason to cancel it, “Heer said.

“But … this is a very political court,” he said.

The proposed change will be subject to the 45-day public comment period.

Since returning to the White House in January, US President Donald Trump again withdrew the agreement with the US and proceeded with the promise of expanding the country’s fossil fuel industries in a big way.

Climate expert: Paris Agreement ‘not certain dead’

Enable JavaScript to watch this video, and consider upgrading to a web browser HTML5 supports video

Edited by: Wesley Rahan

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *