Besent causes a shake in the Bitcoin community

  • Senator Cynthia Lummis said that it is not possible to save the US from her debt buying more BTC.

  • Besent seemed rectified, clarifying that they will consider neutral approaches to acquire bitcoin.

The statements of yesterday of Scott Besent, secretary of the United States Treasury, caused a real stir in the Bitcoiner community. In an interview, the official said that the government does not plan to buy Bitcoin (BTC) for the strategic reserve created by President Donald Trump. Instead, the goal is to accumulate only the BTC seized and stop selling them.

The ironic is that, just a few hours later, Besent clarified His words and repeated what the former CEO of the Digital Assets Working Group, Bo Hines, said for months: that the treasure is committed to exploring “neutral pathways from the budgetary point of view” to increase the BTC reservation, and thus fulfill Trump’s vision of turning the United States into a “worldwide superpower of Bitcoin.”

However, the media whirlwind did not stop growing.

One of the first reactions was Dennis PorterCEO of the Satoshi Action Fund group, who highlighted In a publication that “the states won the race” to establish Bitcoin strategic reservations, in reference to the local initiatives already underway.

And it is that the specialist has closely followed the progress of bills on Bitcoin in different regions of the United States. In fact, as Cryptonoths reported, New Hampshire made history by becoming the first state to approve regulation that authorizes the treasurer to invest up to 5% of public funds in precious metals and BTC.

Porter proposed a Besent a way that the treasure can buy BTC without spending extra money: keep the seized assets that can generate profits through passive methods, such as stakingand use those profits to acquire bitcoin.

As he explained, this model already has a precedent in Arizona: Law HB 2749, approved with bipartisan support, which allows the State to maintain non -claimed properties in its original form to generate profits and reinforce its Bitcoin reserve.

For its part, Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis back a Besent and He said that it is not possible to save the United States from a national debt of 37 billion dollars buying more BTCbut it does consider it feasible to apply measures such as revaluing gold reserves and allocating that increase to strategic reserve.

While some received the secretary’s words, others were not surprised … such is the case of the economist Saifedean Ammous, who reacted With a laconic “I told you” and linking his words to a publication of his from several months ago, in which he said that the Federal Reserve (Fed), as an entity controlled by private banks, would never allow recurring purchases of Bitcoin, since they would represent a direct threat to the dollar.

From El Salvador, Nayib Bukele advisor on Bitcoin, Max Keiser, He warned that the decision of the United States leaves the country “helpless before a rising bitcoin superpower,” formed by sovereign savers who could move to more favorable jurisdictions, such as the Central American nation itself.

Commentator George Bodine was more forceful, affirming that “the United States is not going to buy Bitcoin or revalue gold”, and that “everything that is being done is in executive order and can be reversed in 48 hours with a new administration.” According to Bodine, The true accumulation of BTC will continue to be citizens initiative.

Treasury-Eeu-Fereble-bitcoinTreasury-Eeu-Fereble-bitcoin
From “we will not buy” to explore creative ways: Besent’s sway over BTC. Source: @SecScottbesent.

More clarity requests

Other analysts opted for a more cautious approach. Macroscope, finance advisor, pointed out that Besent’s words sounded confusing And that it is unlikely to completely discard the proposal of the Bitcoin Law, since Trump has declared his support for this project.

«Besent could be referring to non -legislative methods to acquire BTC. Or maybe he wanted to say clumsy the obvious way: that the United States will not ‘buy’ the BTC reserve it already has, ”he said.

It should be noted that the so -called Bitcoin Law is an initiative proposed by Cynthia Lummis, which seeks to establish a formal framework for the US government to acquire and maintain BTC as a strategic reserve, similar to gold reserves.

Sina, 21st capital co -founder, critical The inconsistency of official discoursewhich passed “we want all the BTC that we can get” to “we will not buy, we will only keep what we have.”

In addition, he clarified that there is no clarity about the exact amount of BTC possessed by the government. According to him, «the strategic reserve is following the same path as the Epstein archives [documentación recopilada durante las investigaciones y procesos legales relacionados con Jeffrey Epstein, el financiero multimillonario acusado de liderar una red de tráfico sexual de menores]».

Although Besent made it clear that the basis of the strategic reserve will be the already seized bitcoin and that it will not be sold, its subsequent rectification keeps speculation about creative formulas alive to expand it without affecting the budget. The episode, without a doubt, reflects the tensions between political promises, institutional limitations and a community that follows each movement with magnifying glass.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *