On Monday, the United Nations General Assembly in New York wants a special summit on war at Gaza Strip. It is the continuity of a diplomatic project led by France and Saudi Arabia to push for the revival of two state solutions, with Israel and Palestinians as well as decades of struggle.
In Monday’s meeting, many countries have said that they will join more than 145 United Nations members who already recognize Palestinian as a state. Thesis includes France, Canada, United Kingdom, Belgium, Australia, Luxembourg and Malta.
Most of the recent European announcements on recognizing the Palestinian platform have resulted in an Israeli military campaign in Gaza, according to the Hamas-Interested Health Ministry, more than 65,000 people were killed, although international researchers have estimated the household over toll. On Monday, UNC Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occuped Palestinian Region Published a report It concluded that Israel is a massacre in Gaza.
Israel and its primary ally, the United States, has rejected the report and others have come to the same conclusion and condemned any plan to recognize Palestine as a state, claiming that doing so will be “reward for terror” – on October 7, 2023, attacked, attacked Israel, Militant Hamas Group’s campaign, about 1,200 people.
Just ‘political theater’
Even supporters of Palestinians say that identifying Palestine as a state may be insufficient if it is not combined with action.
“Western states embrace symbolical gestures, while Palestinians are neither left with justice nor on stage, only a withdrawal gap betty reality and international performance,” the Director of Advocacy for Palestine Institute for Public Diplomacy, Director of Planning in Westal, West, West, West, West Bank, West Bank, West Bank, in Westal, West, West, West Bank, West Bank, West Bank, in Westl Argued in August text For Palestinian Think Tank Al Shabaka.
On Wednesday, Guardian The columnist Owen Jones has written that “every action against Israel is demonstrating, so that the call can be reduced for action from the public.”
It is respected how the Israeli will be real for a new batch of beliefs, Richard Govan, UN Director of Think Tank International Crisis Group, Wrote this week In US-based policy magazine Justice,
“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu … has a long track record of defying the rest of the United Nations membership,” Govan wrote. “A landscape that concerns diplomats is that Netanyahu – who announced last week that no Palestinian will be a state” – in his speech, can respond to the process of beliefs by announcing the formally annex parts plan of Palestinian areas. “
Can recognition bring peace?
It is clear that the recognition of a Palestinian state alone will not stop Israel in Gaza.
The columnist Gidon Levi argued in the Israeli newspaper, “recognition is a wrong choice for boycott and punitive measures, which should be taken against the country that ends the massacre.” Hair net in August“Manyata is hollow lip service. … It will not be able to stop the massacre, which will not be stopped by the international community without practicing steps.”
In fact, the issues are different, as legal experts explain. Whether Palestine is a state or not, international law already forces other countries to prevent what they can do to prevent a suspected massacre.
A diplomatic upgradation
What the Palestinian state can recognize is a strong case for a ceasefire within the current international diplomatic, bureaucracy and legal structures.
In case of 2025 edition of quarterly academic journal Cairo Review of Global AffairsEgyptian political analyst Omar of, stated that Palestinian authorities had earlier tried to accept the Geneva Sammelan in 1989, but were rejected by Switzerland, because, Swiss said, Swiss said, was “uncontrolled” about the existence of a Palestinian state.
In August, a peacemaker with the Geneva Center for Security Policy, Nomi Bar-Yakov told DW that the recognition “does not change anything, but it gives Palestinians a lot of share in the position of conversation, it is not the same as a conversation between a state and an unfamiliar state. [or] A state which is just one unit. ,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6an5cfhnv8
Bilateral recognition can be considered a form of diplomatic upgradation. Recognized countries – France or Belgium – should review relationships with Palestine, as well as assess their legal obligations. So it can review relationships with Israel, they argue.
But it should be with practical steps, Lovat told DW.
“Recognition is not a policy: this is an opening. The actual work begins, the latter day,” A lecturer in the Middle East in Australian National University, Anas Assemble, Anas Assemble, Argued in Malevolent Which has been published on global affairs by the Middle East Council at Doha in August.
‘Important re -confirmation’
It is true that recognition is very symbolic, Hugh Lovt, the European Council has a senior policy partner with the Middle East and North Africa program, or ECFR, mindset. “But symbolism is not always a bad thing. Given recognition-fractions and countries doing the UK, especially it is an important re-confirmation of Palestinian rights and self-addresses, the right to remain from possession, the right to the state and so on.”
Nevertheless, symbolic measures should be with practical steps, Lovat said.
At a press conference in Brussels on Wednesday, the European Union Foreign Policy Head, Kaza Kalas encouraged the member states to increase taffs on some Israeli goods and to approve two senior Israeli politicians. These are measures that are experts of ECFR Previously recommendedA source in Brussels told DW that Italy, who had previously opposed the European Union scientist for Israel, could also give up its objects.
“Even three years ago, the recognition story could end,” Lovat said. “But I think, becaus things have moved dramatically in the context of public and political opinion, this is no longer a question of ether. [Palestine] Or you do something. ,
At present, many measures are being advanced simultaneously, Lovat said, and it is reflected how public opinion has changed in political spectrum since 2023.
,[Recognition] The journey should be seen as the trajectory of the journey, “Lovat said.” We cannot reach there tomorrow, but the trajectory is clear. ,
Edited by: M Gaganon